Which legal principle prevents the use of evidence obtained through illegal means?

The Exclusionary Rule is the legal principle that prevents the use of evidence obtained through illegal means. This rule is rooted in the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. When law enforcement obtains evidence without a proper warrant or probable cause, that evidence is considered inadmissible in court due to the potential violation of an individual’s rights.

This principle serves to deter law enforcement from engaging in unconstitutional behavior and ensures that the judicial process remains fair and just. By excluding illegally obtained evidence, the courts uphold the integrity of the legal system and protect citizens' rights against abuses of power by the government.

The other choices do not specifically address the issue of obtaining evidence through unlawful methods. The No Intent to Use does not exist as a recognized legal doctrine in this context. The Miranda Offense Rule pertains to the rights of individuals during police interrogations, particularly the requirement to inform suspects of their rights against self-incrimination. The Due Process Clause, while crucial in ensuring fair legal proceedings, encompasses broader protections and does not specifically focus on the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence.